Take a flight out of London heading west and you might spot a vast construction corridor cutting through the English countryside the future route of HS2, the UK’s first fully domestic high‑speed rail line.
As Australian federal and state governments revive long‑discussed plans for their own fast‑rail networks, the British experience offers a series of cautionary lessons.
A project years behind schedule and billions over budget
Construction on HS2 officially began in 2019, but the project has since become synonymous with delays, ballooning costs and planning failures. What was pitched in 2009 as a £37.5 billion ($72 billion) scheme was, by 2020 estimates, heading toward £100 billion nearly triple the original figure.
The line was initially approved to run from London’s Euston Station to Birmingham, before splitting toward Manchester and Leeds. It was conceived in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, with hopes it would stimulate economic recovery.
But the austerity policies that followed made the project harder to justify. Once construction began, rising inflation accelerated by the COVID‑19 pandemic pushed costs even higher. Public opposition grew steadily.
Route planning: one of HS2’s biggest headaches
The route has been one of the most contentious aspects of HS2. Communities along the proposed line raised concerns about environmental impact, land acquisition and compensation. Political support also wavered as costs spiralled and timelines slipped.
Why this matters for Australia
Experts say HS2’s struggles highlight key issues Australian governments must confront early if they want their own mega‑projects to succeed:
Clear, stable long‑term funding
Transparent cost modelling
Realistic timelines
Community engagement and land‑use planning
Political consistency across election cycles
Without these, Australia risks repeating the UK’s mistakes ambitious visions derailed by poor planning and runaway budgets.
+ There are no comments
Add yours